2017
DOI: 10.3390/min7100179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Key Marine Shale Reservoirs in the Southeastern Margin of the Sichuan Basin, SW China

Abstract: This study performs a comprehensive comparison of three key marine shale reservoirs in the southeastern margin of the Sichuan Basin, and explains why commercial gas production was only achieved in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi (LSL) and Upper Ordovician Wufeng (UOW) formations, but not in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang (LCN) formation. The experimental methods included in situ gas content and gas composition tests, methane adsorption analysis, low-pressure N 2 adsorption, field emission scanning electron microscop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, low-pressure N 2 adsorption analysis was employed because it has been proven as an effective method to investigate pore structures and fractal characteristics of shale reservoirs. 18,[27][28][29][30] In addition, for both the marine and continental shales, the relationships between fractal dimensions and conventional reservoir parameters (mineral constituents, content of total organic carbon (TOC), porosity, permeability and methane adsorption capability) were also discussed. These investigations are helpful for understanding the controlling factors of pore development, as well as the gas accumulation mechanisms in marine and continental shales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, low-pressure N 2 adsorption analysis was employed because it has been proven as an effective method to investigate pore structures and fractal characteristics of shale reservoirs. 18,[27][28][29][30] In addition, for both the marine and continental shales, the relationships between fractal dimensions and conventional reservoir parameters (mineral constituents, content of total organic carbon (TOC), porosity, permeability and methane adsorption capability) were also discussed. These investigations are helpful for understanding the controlling factors of pore development, as well as the gas accumulation mechanisms in marine and continental shales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where GH is hydrostatic pressure gradient, g/cm 3 ; ECD is the circulating equivalent density of drilling fluid, g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Overpressure Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where GH is hydrostatic pressure gradient, g/cm 3 ; ECD is the circulating equivalent density of drilling fluid, g/cm 3 . Drilling engineering data show that dc is mainly controlled by reservoir pressure changes [26,27].…”
Section: Overpressure Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, Zhu et al [25] show the development of abundant macropores in the Longmaxi Shale and suggest, similar to the findings of Liang et al [26], that the proportions of different pore types were significantly changed by structural deformation, and that strongly deformed shales have the least organic pores and the lowest adsorption capacity. The microstructures of tectonically deformed coal (TDC) have also been analyzed in detail by coal geologists [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. These studies have mainly focused on three different aspects: (1) development of TDCs by brittle and ductile deformation of coal seams, (2) macro-and micro-deformation behavior of TDCs, and (3) impact of tectonism and coal rank on the characteristics of pore structures.…”
Section: Influence Of Combined Thermal Evolution and Tectonic Deformamentioning
confidence: 99%