2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three low-cost techniques to control fogging of sealed eyewear in a simulated operating room environment: A preliminary analysis

Abstract: In the current COVID pandemic, hermetically sealed eyewear is recommended for safe surgical practices to prevent eye contact with contaminated airborne particles or aerosols. These sealed eyewears definitely reduce the risk of contamination of eyes. However, there is a constant issue of fogging up of the inner surface that prevents good surgical visibility which can impair surgeons' performance and their ability to perform fine tasks, especially in operating rooms with temperature and humidity controlled as pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the function tests, the r-FT of MG was 212.75 ± 23.95 min, which was 1.5 times longer than that of SG, mainly due to the specific manufacturing process of the lenses and the optimized main body design that lower both temperature and humidity. Kumar et al stated that detergent-based surfactant is a low-cost technique that controls the fogging of goggles and provides a longer duration of clear visibility (69.3 ± 8.16 min) than antifog polyethylene terephthalate films and filtered vents ( 19 ). However, detergent-based surfactants cause frequent eye irritation and slightly distort the vision if the soap is not properly wiped ( 20 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the function tests, the r-FT of MG was 212.75 ± 23.95 min, which was 1.5 times longer than that of SG, mainly due to the specific manufacturing process of the lenses and the optimized main body design that lower both temperature and humidity. Kumar et al stated that detergent-based surfactant is a low-cost technique that controls the fogging of goggles and provides a longer duration of clear visibility (69.3 ± 8.16 min) than antifog polyethylene terephthalate films and filtered vents ( 19 ). However, detergent-based surfactants cause frequent eye irritation and slightly distort the vision if the soap is not properly wiped ( 20 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous fogging of protective glasses due to sweating and inhaled humid air causes an early and sharp decrease in visual acuity, significantly limiting functionality and thus causing physical injuries. Varshney et al 19 stated that liquid soap, iodophor, hand sanitizer, anti‐vapor agents, and films can prevent fogging up, usually for up to 2 h. Cleaning the glasses with the materials mentioned in the literature can be effective in reducing fogging 19,20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varshney et al 19 stated that liquid soap, iodophor, hand sanitizer, anti-vapor agents, and films can prevent fogging up, usually for up to 2 h. Cleaning the glasses with the materials mentioned in the literature can be effective in reducing fogging. 19,20 It was determined that 69.0% of nurses experienced bladder pain due to delaying the need to go to the toilet while in PPE (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to Scuba divers' traditional technique to prevent fogging of eyewear by using spit/diluted liquid soap/ shampoo on inner surface of their goggles. Detergentbased surfactant coating has been shown to work better and longer, in simulated conditions than other ideas [7]. 3.…”
Section: Improving the Barrier Between Mask And Glassesmentioning
confidence: 97%