2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three methods for calculation of electron transfer probability in H++Ne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TDDFT method has been described thoroughly in previous works [17][18][19] and we only briefly discuss it here. In principle, all dynamic information of ion-atom collisions can be obtained by using the TDSE method.…”
Section: Theoretical and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TDDFT method has been described thoroughly in previous works [17][18][19] and we only briefly discuss it here. In principle, all dynamic information of ion-atom collisions can be obtained by using the TDSE method.…”
Section: Theoretical and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these complications due to the target non-Coulomb potential are also very hard to be incorporated in any ab initio calculation. In this regard it should be mentioned that there are many fruitful references to the nonperturbative models [22][23][24][25][26][27] and the densityfunctional theories [28][29][30], which have been sufficiently effective to tackle the multielectronic problem particularly for the heavier atomic targets, large molecules, clusters or even solids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about the projectile's charge state could be estimated by analyzing coefficients of the KS orbitals in an atomic orbital basis, 36,[60][61][62][63] by projecting the KS orbitals onto atomic orbitals, 64 or by considering probabilities that the KS orbitals are localized within a given volume of interest. [65][66][67][68][69] However, many of these methods have well-known shortcomings, most notably that they rely directly on the single-particle, non-interacting KS orbitals which have no rigorous physical meaning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%