1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2825(1997)11:4<179::aid-jcla1>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three methods for 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone

Abstract: We compared the performance of three 17α‐hydroxyprogesterone kits: the double antibody method, the coated tube method (ACTIVE™), both from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. (DSL) and the coated tube method (COAT‐A‐COUNT®) from Diagnostic Products Corporation (DPC). The assay performance of the two DSL kits was very similar in terms of sensitivity, intra‐ and inter‐assay precision, linearity of dilution, recovery, and specificity. We also analyzed 190 samples for 17α‐hydroxyprogesterone values using the abo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Screening for CAH in newborns has become a routine part of many programs by measuring levels of 17αhydroxyprogesterone (17OH-P) (1,2). Currently, neonatal screening procedures for CAH are based on immunoassays (3,4). This approach, while practical, lacks some degree of specificity because of cross-reacting congeners that cannot be separated from 17OH-P in the direct assay (4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening for CAH in newborns has become a routine part of many programs by measuring levels of 17αhydroxyprogesterone (17OH-P) (1,2). Currently, neonatal screening procedures for CAH are based on immunoassays (3,4). This approach, while practical, lacks some degree of specificity because of cross-reacting congeners that cannot be separated from 17OH-P in the direct assay (4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring and screening for CAH patients by measuring levels of 17α‐hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) or other steroids has become a routine part of many programmes 1,. 2 Numerous methods have been described to determine these steroid hormones, such as fluorimetry,3,, 4 radioimmunoassay (RIA),5–8 and high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) 4,. 9,, 10 Most of these, however, are affected by a degree of interference or cross‐reactivity with other steroids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1)1, 2 has become a routine part of many neonatal screening programs. Currently, neonatal screening procedures for CAH are based on immunoassays 3, 4. This approach, while practical, lacks some degree of specificity because of cross‐reacting congeners that cannot be separated from 17OHP in the direct assay 4–6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%