2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14236068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Mixed-Effects Models for Mass Movement Susceptibility Mapping Based on Incomplete Inventory in China

Abstract: Generating an unbiased inventory of mass movements is challenging, particularly in a large region such as China. However, due to the enormous threat to human life and property caused by the increasing number of mass movements, it is imperative to develop a reliable nationwide mass movement susceptibility model to identify mass movement-prone regions and formulate appropriate disaster prevention strategies. In recent years, the mixed-effects models have shown their unique advantages in dealing with the biased m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 111 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a single qualitative or quantitative model is deemed insufficient for landslide prediction research. Accordingly, the exploration of landslide susceptibility evaluation models has evolved from a single model to a combined model (He et al 2022). He et al proposed a vulnerability evaluation method that combines the RF model and the information value model to address the issue that the traditional information value model did not account for the weight of the evaluation factors, resulting in detrimental effects on the susceptibility partitioning results (He et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a single qualitative or quantitative model is deemed insufficient for landslide prediction research. Accordingly, the exploration of landslide susceptibility evaluation models has evolved from a single model to a combined model (He et al 2022). He et al proposed a vulnerability evaluation method that combines the RF model and the information value model to address the issue that the traditional information value model did not account for the weight of the evaluation factors, resulting in detrimental effects on the susceptibility partitioning results (He et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%