2021
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Physical—Cognitive Training Programs in Healthy Older Adults: A Study Protocol for a Monocentric Randomized Trial

Abstract: (1) Combining aerobic, coordination and cognitive training allows for more improved physical and cognitive performance than when performed separately. A Nordic walking (NW) and two cognitive-motor circuit training programs (CT-c and CT-fit) are compared. CT-c and CT-fit stimulate cognition differently: CT-c, is through conventional complex coordination training performed in single and dual-task conditions; CT-fit, incorporates it into complex goal-directed actions, implemented by fitness gaming technology (2) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the available data did not support the hypothesis that MDT resulted in superior cognitive benefits, as compared to separated cognitive training (Rahe et al, 2015a,b;Kalbe et al, 2018). These results were rather unexpected since MDT was hypothesized to be an effective training intervention that capitalizes on the combination of the effects of physical, motor, and cognitive exercises (Voelcker-Rehage et al, 2010Pesce, 2012;Temprado et al, 2019;Temprado, 2021;Torre et al, 2021). The weakness of the effects of MDT training on brain and cognition could reflect the too low intensity of physical exercises and/or the low complexity of motor and cognitive exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the available data did not support the hypothesis that MDT resulted in superior cognitive benefits, as compared to separated cognitive training (Rahe et al, 2015a,b;Kalbe et al, 2018). These results were rather unexpected since MDT was hypothesized to be an effective training intervention that capitalizes on the combination of the effects of physical, motor, and cognitive exercises (Voelcker-Rehage et al, 2010Pesce, 2012;Temprado et al, 2019;Temprado, 2021;Torre et al, 2021). The weakness of the effects of MDT training on brain and cognition could reflect the too low intensity of physical exercises and/or the low complexity of motor and cognitive exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Once again, further works are needed to address this issue, in particular, to test the potential superiority of MDT over the other training interventions. The hypothesis that MDT should be the most effective training intervention remains, however, to be confirmed thanks to conceptuallygrounded training protocols (e.g., Torre et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations