2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.487071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three post-processing methods for acoustic localization

Abstract: Recently, the need of monitoring parking places, airports, and harbours has increased. Microwaves, infrared based techniques, vision, or acoustics are the key techniques but each of them requires a specific kind of postprocessing. Far field target localization methods based on Angle Of Arrival (AOA) often neglect the possibility of erroneous angle observations. Three different methods for increasing the accuracy of cross fixing based localization are compared. Average of the AOAs is easily corrupted by outlier… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With six or more UGSs detecting an event, estimating the location of an event can be solved in a number of known ways [1,3,4,5,7]. However, when the number of UGSs that detect an event is below six, the problem becomes increasingly hard; in fact, the general problem has been shown to be a constrained non-convex quadratic programming problem that is non-polynomial (NP) hard [9].…”
Section: Source Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With six or more UGSs detecting an event, estimating the location of an event can be solved in a number of known ways [1,3,4,5,7]. However, when the number of UGSs that detect an event is below six, the problem becomes increasingly hard; in fact, the general problem has been shown to be a constrained non-convex quadratic programming problem that is non-polynomial (NP) hard [9].…”
Section: Source Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the availability of digital signal processing methods, free-field array geometries have lead to such applications as the sniper detector, which uses a 3-D free field array to localization impulsive events based on time delay of arrival (TDOA) methods. Several methods have been offered to increase the accuracy of TDOA methods, such as cross-fixing, energy based localization, and statistical methods [2]. In the realm of teleconferencing, digital microphone array processing techniques have been used to augment the accuracy of current TDOA methods [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%