2016
DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20160068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three tester parents in evaluating popcorn families derived from IAC-125

Abstract: Comparação de três testadores na avaliação de famílias de milho pipoca derivadas de IAC-125

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic variability was observed in the F2 and F2:3 generations (Table 1). The coefficient of environmental variation (CVe) reflected the precision of the phenotyping measurement performed in this study, and the confidence of the analyses agreed with those of other popcorn phenotyping studies (Guimarães et al, 2018;Miotto et al, 2016).…”
Section: Genetic Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Genetic variability was observed in the F2 and F2:3 generations (Table 1). The coefficient of environmental variation (CVe) reflected the precision of the phenotyping measurement performed in this study, and the confidence of the analyses agreed with those of other popcorn phenotyping studies (Guimarães et al, 2018;Miotto et al, 2016).…”
Section: Genetic Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…al. 2018, Miotto et al (2016, Rajitha et al (2014) and Vijaya bharathi et al (2009) also reported similar findings.…”
Section: Grain Weight Of Five Cobs Shelling (%) = ------------------×mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Rosa et al (2020) also reported the good performance of tester 70.H26.1 in exploring the genetic variability among forage maize progenies. In this context, the tester that provides the highest estimates of genetic variance among topcross hybrids is the most appropriate, allowing the expression of the genetic variability of the progenies and highlighting the ones with greatest genetic merit (Guimarães et al, 2012;Bolson, Scapim, Clovis, Amaral Junior, & Freitas, 2016;Miotto et al, 2016;Figueiredo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%