2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62191-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomised double-blind study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

17
323
3
31

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 604 publications
(374 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
17
323
3
31
Order By: Relevance
“…The data from randomized clinical trials confirmed that stronger platelet inhibition in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with PCI reduces the rate of ischemic events, with an increase in risk of bleeding complications [29][30][31][32]. However, such an association has been less apparent in patients with stable angina [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data from randomized clinical trials confirmed that stronger platelet inhibition in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with PCI reduces the rate of ischemic events, with an increase in risk of bleeding complications [29][30][31][32]. However, such an association has been less apparent in patients with stable angina [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All 3 arms in RE‐DUAL PCI will allow the use of ticagrelor, given the benefits seen in reducing risk of death and the lack of increase in major bleeding, when analyzed in intent‐to‐treat, compared with clopidogrel in the Platelet Inhibition and Platelet Outcomes (PLATO) trial 39. It should also be noted that there are sparse data on the use of ticagrelor in nonvalvular AF patients who have undergone PCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the inherent limitations of clopidogrel are well recognised, including a slow onset of action and a variable response [10][11][12][13] . Prasugrel and ticagrelor provide superior protection against ischaemic adverse events compared with clopidogrel in patients following an ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [14][15][16] . Notwithstanding this, both drugs incur an increased risk of spontaneous bleeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%