2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Time to Retreatment and Visual Function Between Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data showed that approximately 63%, 38%, and 19% of the treatment-naïve AMD eyes did not require additional aflibercept injections during the following 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, respectively (Figure 1C). Using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, the eyes treated with ranibizumab were shown to relapse earlier than the aflibercept-treated eyes, but the overall recurrence percentage was not statistically different between these drug groups as reported recently by Inoue et al,17 and more than 80% of the treated eyes experienced a recurrence within 1 year. Thus, with the use of aflibercept, more than 80% of the patients needed additional injections within 1 year, and approximately half of the patients needed proactive treatment due to either a poor response or dependence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The data showed that approximately 63%, 38%, and 19% of the treatment-naïve AMD eyes did not require additional aflibercept injections during the following 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, respectively (Figure 1C). Using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, the eyes treated with ranibizumab were shown to relapse earlier than the aflibercept-treated eyes, but the overall recurrence percentage was not statistically different between these drug groups as reported recently by Inoue et al,17 and more than 80% of the treated eyes experienced a recurrence within 1 year. Thus, with the use of aflibercept, more than 80% of the patients needed additional injections within 1 year, and approximately half of the patients needed proactive treatment due to either a poor response or dependence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Finally, another recent study from Japan examined the time to retreatment with ranibizumab compared to aflibercept after 3 consecutive monthly injections, using a pro re nata regimen in the maintenance phase for both treatments [27] . Both drugs had the same median time to retreatment (5 months) and similar rates of requiring any injections in the maintenance phase up to 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Continued ) Similarly Inoue et al, looked at a cohort of 101 patients and demonstrated an improvement in BCVA from 0.37 logMAR to 0.25 logMAR. The study also showed that 63.5% of patients needed re-treatment and 36.5% of patients did not need further treatment 30. …”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A comparative study by Inoue et al, compared between PRN ranibizumab and aflibercept and found that although both groups showed a significant improvement from baseline, there was no difference between the visual improvements between both drugs. 30 In addition, the mean time to retreatment was 5 months in both groups. Similar number of patients required retreatment in both groups (67.7 in the ranibizumab group vs 63.4% in the aflibercept group).…”
Section: Aflibercept Vs Ranibizumabmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation