2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2772-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
131
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsidence was measured across the entire motion segment for both single and multilevel constructs and was defined as a loss of intervertebral height greater than 3 mm. 7 Prevertebral soft-tissue thickness was determined by measuring the thickness of soft tissue from the anterior aspect of C3-7 vertebral bodies to the posterior aspect of the trachea. 1,35,42 Magnification effects were corrected for by using the Zero-P implant as a standard reference.…”
Section: Radiological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsidence was measured across the entire motion segment for both single and multilevel constructs and was defined as a loss of intervertebral height greater than 3 mm. 7 Prevertebral soft-tissue thickness was determined by measuring the thickness of soft tissue from the anterior aspect of C3-7 vertebral bodies to the posterior aspect of the trachea. 1,35,42 Magnification effects were corrected for by using the Zero-P implant as a standard reference.…”
Section: Radiological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our subsidence rate at an average follow-up of 10 months was 22.7%, which is within the range previously reported by other authors (Table 5). 7,9,20,44,45 …”
Section: Radiological Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4] After removal of the intervertebral disc, either autologous bone or a cage -with or without anterior plate fixation (APF) -are current options for fusion. [5][6][7] For single-level ACDF the use of a cage or autologous bone, with or without APF, has shown comparable clinical and radiographic results, with a tendency for better radiographic outcome in patients with APF. [8,9] However, for more than 1-level ACDF there is currently no evidence in the literature suggesting superiority of one technique over any other, especially regarding the issue of whether APF is superior to the stand-alone technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the PEEK cages were not filled with bone graft. On the other hand, Chen et al, 6 in their study using PEEK cages filled with local bone graft in 31 patients (each with 3 levels disc pathology), reported 100% fusion rate after 7 years follow up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that this method of treatment is an effective procedure for the treatment of multiple level cervical disc disease. Chen et al, 6 came to the conclusion that in surgical treatment of multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy, PEEK cage is superior to titanium cage in maintenance of intervertebral height and cervical lordosis, resulting in better clinical outcomes in the long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%