2007
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2007.895712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Topography- and Aperture-Dependent Motion Compensation Algorithms for Airborne SAR

Abstract: Abstract-This letter presents a comparison between threeFourier-based motion compensation (MoCo) algorithms for airborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems. These algorithms circumvent the limitations of conventional MoCo, namely the assumption of a reference height and the beam-center approximation. All these approaches rely on the inherent time-frequency relation in SAR systems but exploit it differently, with the consequent differences in accuracy and computational burden. After a brief overview of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the bulk MOCO has been researched a lot in [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], here it is only simply mentioned for deriving the following residual error discussion.…”
Section: Principle Of the Bulk Mocomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the bulk MOCO has been researched a lot in [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], here it is only simply mentioned for deriving the following residual error discussion.…”
Section: Principle Of the Bulk Mocomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the motion error is known as a priori information, then the next step is to compensate the errors; based on some previous researches on this topic [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], a widely used algorithm is bulk MOCO. The algorithm is implemented in two steps to compensate the range-independent and range-dependent motion errors respectively [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The errors induced by this approximation are detailed in [21]. A number of methods have been proposed as alternatives to this approximation, as discussed in [22]. When using this approximation, we apply the correction filter (10) to the raw data.…”
Section: B Simplifying Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the original MOCO methods only take range-dependent motion error into account, and the residual azimuth-dependent motion error should also be considered, which is nonignorable for high-resolution airborne MMW SAR imaging with wide swath. The existed azimuth-dependent MOCO algorithms [14][15][16][17][18] could precisely compensate the azimuth-dependent motion error and modify the azimuth matched filtering function in order to eliminate the influence of azimuth-variant motion error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%