2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of traditional and zero-conditioning flotation performances of oxidized anthracite coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CC, CH 3 , and CH 2 groups are responsible for hydrophobicity in coal, while CO, OH, and COC groups impart hydrophilicity. [ 57 ] The peak intensity of hydrophobic groups is less than that of the hydrophilic group, confirming the surface oxidation of coal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The CC, CH 3 , and CH 2 groups are responsible for hydrophobicity in coal, while CO, OH, and COC groups impart hydrophilicity. [ 57 ] The peak intensity of hydrophobic groups is less than that of the hydrophilic group, confirming the surface oxidation of coal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, diesel is not efficient in the flotation of oxidised coals. The oxidation of coals generates oxygen-containing groups which prevent the adsorption of diesel on coal surfaces [1,[3][4][5][6]. In the previous study, we used X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to determine the degree of coal surface oxidation as the atomic percentage (at.%) of oxidised carbon on coal surfaces [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%