2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00956.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of transposed brachiobasilic fistulas to upper arm grafts and brachiocephalic fistulas

Abstract: Transposed brachiobasilic fistulas provide cumulative patency equivalent to upper arm grafts and brachiocephalic fistulas. They are less likely to thrombose and become infected than upper arm grafts. Compared with brachiocephalic fistula, they are more likely to mature but are at increased risk of thrombosis after maturation. Transposed brachiobasilic fistulas should be considered before placing an upper arm graft for patients that cannot achieve a functional brachiocephalic fistula.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
193
5
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
20
193
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fistulas that fail to mature (FTM) are increasingly more common with rates between 9% and 70% (18,19) and the highest FTM rates among the elderly, diabetics, and those with vascular disease (19), the same group that represents the largest growth in dialysis. When this early fistula failure is considered in cumulative patency analysis, there is little difference compared with graft patency (20,21). The role of a graft needs to be reconsidered given the conquerable patency and the trade off between interventions required to get a fistula to maturation versus intervention to maintain patency in a graft (22), and the shortened time from creation to use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fistulas that fail to mature (FTM) are increasingly more common with rates between 9% and 70% (18,19) and the highest FTM rates among the elderly, diabetics, and those with vascular disease (19), the same group that represents the largest growth in dialysis. When this early fistula failure is considered in cumulative patency analysis, there is little difference compared with graft patency (20,21). The role of a graft needs to be reconsidered given the conquerable patency and the trade off between interventions required to get a fistula to maturation versus intervention to maintain patency in a graft (22), and the shortened time from creation to use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, altering the presentation of data comparing cumulative survival (time from access creation to irreversible failure) can have a significant impact on the conclusion that survival of AVF is superior to grafts. One-year primary (intervention-free or unassisted) survival ( Figure 6) and secondary (cumulative or assisted) survival are higher in AVF than in grafts when early failures or failures of AVF maturation are excluded, but this is not true for cumulative patency when early events are included in the analysis (20,70). Allon et al (20) found a superior 6-mo assisted patency rate with grafts and an identical 2-yr cumulative patency when compared with AVF.…”
Section: Impact On the Patient: The Patient Is Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were followed up for 1 yr, during which primary and secondary AVF patency rates were measured. T he low prevalence of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) among US hemodialysis (HD) patients (1,2) has initiated nationwide measures to increase AVF creation and prevalence (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Among these are providing educational programs, setting forth guidelines and goals (3,4), implementing multidisciplinary approaches (4 -9), encouraging preoperative venous mapping (14 -19), and asking surgeons to create AVF instead of arteriovenous grafts (AVG) (10 -21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%