Comparison of Tritube™ tube and Evone® ventilator use with traditional narrow-lumen tube use in microlaryngeal surgery cases

Abstract

Comparison of TritubeTM Tube and Evone® Ventilator Use with Traditional Narrow-Lumen Tube Use in Microlaryngeal Surgery Cases
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction: Upper airway surgery involves certain difficulties, such as tumors located in the endotracheal area, narrowing of the tracheal lumen by the tumor, the use of a narrow lumen tube constantly increasing pressure. In the literature, difficult airway management has been successfully performed in patients intubated with Tritube™ and ventilated with Evone® (Ventinova Medical, Eindhoven, The Netherlands), and the benefits of these tools during laryngeal surgery have been reported.
 Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Tritube™ tube and Evone® ventilator and compare patients intubated using Tritube™ and ventilated with flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) using Evone® (TT–FCV group) to those intubated using a traditional microlaryngeal intubation tube and ventilated with volume-controlled ventilation (MLT-VCV group) in terms of perioperative parameters and outcomes during microlaryngeal surgery (MLS). 
 Materials and Methods: After receiving their informed consent, 18 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients older than 18 years, who were scheduled for elective MLS were included in the study. The patients’ demographic parameters, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status (ASA), Mallampati and Cormack-Lehane scores, duration of ventilation, duration of surgery, hemodynamic parameters, ventilation parameters, and complications were recorded.
 Results: When the intraoperative respiratory and hemodynamic parameters of the patients were compared between the two groups, the intraoperative cerebral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) (p=0.020), tidal volume (p=0.005), compliance of the respiratory system (p=0.001), and post-extubation SpO₂ (p=0.001) values were statistically significantly higher in the TT-FVC group compared to the MLT-VCV group. Right SpO₂ (p=0.038), left SpO₂ (p=0.047), and time to extubation (p=0.021) were statistically significantly lower in the TT-FVC group compared to the MLT-VCV group.
 Discussion: Low airway peak pressure and stable hemodynamics were achieved with Tritube™, and no complications were encountered in the perioperative period. At the end of the surgery, the cuff was lowered, high-frequency jet ventilation was applied, and extubation was safe performed (3). Although the literature on TritubeTM and Evone® is still limited, the use of these tools in MLS appears to be advantageous to achieve safe airway management.
 Keywords: Microlaryngeal surgery, Ventilation, Hemodynamics