2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two analytical methods for detecting Clostridium spores in milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there is no universally accepted method for enumerating Clostridium spores in milk. The commonly employed microbiological methods rely on the detection of gas production, leading to the rising of a paraffin plug over a vial 3 . However, these methods lack selectivity for Clostridium and can be influenced by competing bacteria, particularly facultatively anaerobic spore-forming Bacilli, that produce only CO2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no universally accepted method for enumerating Clostridium spores in milk. The commonly employed microbiological methods rely on the detection of gas production, leading to the rising of a paraffin plug over a vial 3 . However, these methods lack selectivity for Clostridium and can be influenced by competing bacteria, particularly facultatively anaerobic spore-forming Bacilli, that produce only CO2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if there is no universally accepted method for enumerating Clostridium spores in milk, everyday employed methods rely on the detection of gas production. In particular the most common method is based on the rising of a paraffin plug over a vial 3 . However, relying solely on the indiscriminate production of gas does not allow for the identification of Clostridia contamination from that of bacteria that do not produce hydrogen, such as Bacilli .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%