2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two commercial kits and an in-house ELISA for the detection of equine rotavirus in foal feces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the commercially available human RVA ELISA assays have been used for detection of RVA in animals (Bailey et al, 2013). However, as a result of antigenic drift, there are several variants or genotypes of RVA VP6 that have been described (Mino et al, 2015). Differences among these VP6 genotypes influence the performance of various commercially available VP6 based immunoassays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the commercially available human RVA ELISA assays have been used for detection of RVA in animals (Bailey et al, 2013). However, as a result of antigenic drift, there are several variants or genotypes of RVA VP6 that have been described (Mino et al, 2015). Differences among these VP6 genotypes influence the performance of various commercially available VP6 based immunoassays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, diagnostic kit validation for each species is necessary. Not all the assays have been validated for use in all animal species, and this is particularly true for horses (Mino et al, 2015). In fact, one human RVA rapid immunoassay developed for patient-side use was shown not to work in detection of RVA in horses (Slovis et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target rotaviruses in different titers were recognized by the immobilized monoclonal antibodies, resulting in a change in the impedance spectra of immunosensor interface. The limit of detection was 2.3 PFU mL −1 which is comparable to the minimal infective dose (1 PFU) and much lower than the limit of detection of commercially available ELISA kits (10 2 Focus forming units (FFU)/mL) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…562,611,612 Fecal PCR analysis is also useful in documenting Clostridium, Lawsonia intracellularis, and Cryptosporidium spp., as well as both equine rotavirus and equine coronavirus. 539,616 Serologic methods, evaluating the presence of antibodies, have been used in the diagnosis of Neorickettsia risticii and Lawsonia intracellularis. 539,572,615 A number of commercial assays are also available for the detection of rotavirus antigen.…”
Section: Ancillary Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%