2017
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000003660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Different Grafts in Nasal Framework Reconstruction of Binder Syndrome

Abstract: Autologous costal cartilage is more favorable to reconstruct the nasal framework and regain nasal esthetics of Binder syndrome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only 3 authors compared the results of various surgical techniques. Tian et al 23 compared the results of rhinoplasty with silicone and rhinoplasty with the chondrocostal graft. Both surgical methods corrected the Binder nasal deformity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, only 3 authors compared the results of various surgical techniques. Tian et al 23 compared the results of rhinoplasty with silicone and rhinoplasty with the chondrocostal graft. Both surgical methods corrected the Binder nasal deformity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies (12/14 studies) performed rhinoplasties to treat nasomaxillary dysplasia. Different surgical techniques were used depending on the authors: the rhinoplasty was associated with either a chondrocostal graft, 8,18,19,[22][23][24][25] a bony graft, 9,20,25,26 or an allogenic graft (silicone in 2 articles 19,23 and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) implants in 1 article). 27 The 2 other articles evaluated maxillary osteotomy techniques (a modified LeFort II osteotomy 14 and LeFort I osteotomy).…”
Section: Surgical Options To Treat Nasomaxillary Dysplasiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, appropriate transplanting materials to reshape the nasal alar is the key and also the focus of a successful operation. [5][6][7][8] The treatment must ensure the reduction of displaced tissue and tissue offering firm support. The bird-shaped incision can expose the greater alar cartilage to the most extent, and its medial and lateral foot must be separated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have also employed alloplastic implants for augmentation and expansion of the soft tissue envelope. 22,33,43 However, Silastic implants are associated with complications of chronic inflammation, infection and extrusion, [44][45][46] with extrusion rates as high as 10 per cent for dorsal placement to 50 per cent for columellar placement according to one study. 45 These patients with a constricted skin envelope are at particular risk of extrusion because of pressure on the tight skin by the unyielding implant, especially in the columella.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%