2000
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2000.9695029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two different meat inspection techniques

Abstract: SUMMARYField studies of meat inspection procedures in three different slaughter houses were performed in Germany, in 1996. In total 22,634 fattening pigs from 63 farms were inspected twice, using a visual and the traditional (mandatory inspection system) procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using the rate of ND+ (Non-Detected Positives) for both visual and traditional inspection.Neither the visual nor the traditional methods detected all lesions which were supposed to be in the lot of animals inspecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of gross (visible) tuberculous lesions at slaughter has proved to be an essential component of the overall bovine TB surveillance system for the cattle population [ 1 ]. With respect to effectiveness of factory surveillance for bovine TB, several studies have been conducted, some based on univariable analysis [ 2 - 5 ] and two using multivariable analysis [ 6 , 7 ]. The multivariable approach is preferable because it helps ensure that measures of surveillance effectiveness are adjusted for factors that can affect the TB status (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of gross (visible) tuberculous lesions at slaughter has proved to be an essential component of the overall bovine TB surveillance system for the cattle population [ 1 ]. With respect to effectiveness of factory surveillance for bovine TB, several studies have been conducted, some based on univariable analysis [ 2 - 5 ] and two using multivariable analysis [ 6 , 7 ]. The multivariable approach is preferable because it helps ensure that measures of surveillance effectiveness are adjusted for factors that can affect the TB status (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EU regulations (EC) No 853/2004 and No 2019/627 require that VOI systems be scientifically sound and not result in any increased food safety risks or risk to animal health and welfare (24,25,27,28). Risk assessments should assess the unique regional disease risks or other risks associated with production conditions prior to VOI implementation (50). Important risk factors are rearing environment (i.e., indoor controlled housing, outdoors foraging) and animal health and disease epidemiology for specific regions (36,53,54).…”
Section: Logistics Of Voi Implementation At the Slaughterhouse Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%