2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2006.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two different processes to synthesize biodiesel by waste cooking oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
147
0
24

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
147
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the advantages of using biodiesel fuel are its renewability, easy biodegradability, non-toxicity and safer handling due to its higher flash point compared to those of fossil fuels [3]. In addition, biodiesel fuel is also primarily free of sulfur and aromatics, producing more tolerable exhaust gas emissions than conventional fossil diesel [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the advantages of using biodiesel fuel are its renewability, easy biodegradability, non-toxicity and safer handling due to its higher flash point compared to those of fossil fuels [3]. In addition, biodiesel fuel is also primarily free of sulfur and aromatics, producing more tolerable exhaust gas emissions than conventional fossil diesel [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional ultrasonic cleaner and mechanical stirring experiments were performed using the same amounts of reactants and molar ratio WCO to MeOH used in the ultrasonic tubular reactor. The conversion of FFA in the WCO into FAME (fatty acid methyl ester) was calculated from the mean of acid value (Av) of the oil layer by the following equation (1) [31]. ) where Oil and WCO refers to FAME layer and waste cooking oil, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Type Ultrasonic and Mechanical Stirring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lauric acid methyl ester (methyl laurate) was added as a reference into the crude biodiesel, and the samples were analyzed by the above mentioned GC. The analysis of biodiesel for each sample was carried out according to Wang et al (2006). FAME wt% ¼ area ofallFAME area of reference  weight of reference weight of Biodiesel sample  f FAME f r  100 ð1Þ…”
Section: Biodiesel Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. As depicted in this figure esterification and transesterification of FFA and TGs are performed slowly (Wang et al 2006;Zhang et al 2003), in which after 6 h the methyl ester weight percent was 29.4 %. Depending on Fig.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%