2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two DNA extraction methods: PrepFiler® BTA and modified PCI-silica based for DNA analysis from bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the poor performance of the QIAamp ® DNA Investigator method for DNA extraction from bones and teeth was also observed in studies performed by Kus et al (2016) [13] and Harrel et al (2019) [11]. Overall, the standard PrepFiler Express BTA TM method gave the most optimal DNA yields, using an incubation time of 2 h, with the option to extend this incubation time to a maximum of 18 h. This is in agreement with the results presented by Hasap et al (2019) [21] and Zgonjanin et al (2017) [22], who obtained similar or better results for bone and tooth samples extracted using the PrepFiler TM BTA Forensic DNA extraction kit compared to the phenol-chloroform-isopropanol method. Analysis of PowerPlex ® 21 profiles also showed the standard method of the PrepFiler Express BTA TM chemistry consistently produced a higher number of loci, meeting threshold requirements compared to the phenol-chloroform method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, the poor performance of the QIAamp ® DNA Investigator method for DNA extraction from bones and teeth was also observed in studies performed by Kus et al (2016) [13] and Harrel et al (2019) [11]. Overall, the standard PrepFiler Express BTA TM method gave the most optimal DNA yields, using an incubation time of 2 h, with the option to extend this incubation time to a maximum of 18 h. This is in agreement with the results presented by Hasap et al (2019) [21] and Zgonjanin et al (2017) [22], who obtained similar or better results for bone and tooth samples extracted using the PrepFiler TM BTA Forensic DNA extraction kit compared to the phenol-chloroform-isopropanol method. Analysis of PowerPlex ® 21 profiles also showed the standard method of the PrepFiler Express BTA TM chemistry consistently produced a higher number of loci, meeting threshold requirements compared to the phenol-chloroform method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Using a set of 25 worked coral samples, we evaluated which one of five candidate DNA extraction protocols is most suited to retrieve DNA from worked precious coral samples. Each of the five tested methods (abbreviated as "W", "F", "B", "E", "Y") have earlier proven to be useful in extracting DNA from biomineralized material 29,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] . DNA was extracted from each of the 25 worked coral skeletal samples with all five techniques, and DNA purity and quantity were assessed using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) technology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two samples (18,46) formed a sister clade to the former group with the posterior probability value 1. Finally, seven identical samples (1,2,25,33,42,44,50) were same as sequences of Pleurocorallium niveum. These were grouped together as an unresolved tree branch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purification or isolation of biological samples, especially deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which is a biological information storage molecule, is crucial and a starting point for many genetic studies, forensic science, clinical diagnosis of rare diseases, cancer, and/or virus-based sicknesses. So far, many different techniques, such as size exclusion chromatography, ion-exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography, alkaline extraction, the salting-out method, filter papers, silica matrices (gels, resins, or beads), and magnetic beads (with commercially available forms in packed-column, gravity column, spin-column, spin-plates, and magnetic stands), have conveniently been employed to isolate DNA. DNA isolation techniques commonly rely on adsorption–desorption mechanisms via solid-phase extraction, electrostatic interactions, or sequence-specific capture .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%