2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two DNA sequence-based typing schemes for the Fusarium solani Species Complex and proposal of a new consensus method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with another multilocus analysis with high support for branches [43]. However, F. solani is a complex of species [44] and our results show that within the complex, recombination is restrained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in agreement with another multilocus analysis with high support for branches [43]. However, F. solani is a complex of species [44] and our results show that within the complex, recombination is restrained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The NS and DS were found to be comparable indicating the schemes have similar resolutions which is consistent with others observations of multiple schemes for single bacteria (Ahmed et al, 2011; Debourgogne et al, 2012; Maiden, 2006). The two schemes have different gene compositions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Maiden (2006) suggests that multiple MLST schemes for the same organism will be comparable if the schemes are well designed. However, when multiple schemes are available, it is important to compare schemes based on discriminative and phylogenetic resolutions since these may vary between schemes depending on the diversity of the genes selected (Ahmed et al, 2011; Debourgogne et al, 2012; Kilian, Scholz, & Lomholt, 2012; Maiden, 2006). The purpose of this study was to compare the two MLST schemes (Nakano and Do schemes) available for S. mutans for use in the verification of rep-PCR genotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular markers useful for phylogenetics tend to utilize coding and intron sequences of various genes and have proved useful for distinguishing not only species, but also common intraspecific sequence types (STs) [26,34-36]. A three-locus MLST system developed for clinically relevant members of the species-rich Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC), which are all nested with Clade 3, utilizes an intron-rich portion of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (TEF), a portion of the nuclear ribosomal RNA gene repeat that includes the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions and D1-D2 region of the nuclear large ribosomal RNA subunit gene (rDNA), and the gene encoding RNA polymerase II second largest subunit ( RPB2 ) [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%