2016
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two ELISA Methods and Mass Spectrometry for Measurement of Vitamin D-Binding Protein: Implications for the Assessment of Bioavailable Vitamin D Concentrations Across Genotypes

Abstract: Studies using vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) concentrations to estimate free and bioavailable vitamin D have increased dramatically in recent years. Combinations of two single-nucleotide polymorphisms produce three major DBP isoforms (Gc1f, Gc1s and Gc2). A recent study showed that DBP concentrations quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) did not differ by race, while a widely used monoclonal ELISA quantified DBP differentially by isoform, yielding significantly lower DBP conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
72
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
10
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of comparison studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of LC-MS against immunoassays, typically on analytes that give poor and conflicting results in immunoassays such as cortisol [20], glucagon [21] and vitamin D binding protein [22] to name but a few. The studies conducted to date generally show a good correlation between the two methodologies, even if the absolute concentrations differ due to the selectivity differences of both techniques.…”
Section: Comparison Of Immunoassays and Lc-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of comparison studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of LC-MS against immunoassays, typically on analytes that give poor and conflicting results in immunoassays such as cortisol [20], glucagon [21] and vitamin D binding protein [22] to name but a few. The studies conducted to date generally show a good correlation between the two methodologies, even if the absolute concentrations differ due to the selectivity differences of both techniques.…”
Section: Comparison Of Immunoassays and Lc-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) transports vitamin D metabolites in serum [3]. Up to 90% of vitamin D is bound to VDBP, ~10% binds to albumin and <1% circulates in the free form.…”
Section: Measurement Of Vitamin Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When researchers calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D levels based on VDBP levels, they found that 25(OH)D levels were similar across races. However, a 2016 study [3] concluded that the assay used to measure VDBP in the 2013 study was biased, leading to incorrect conclusions about racial differences in bioactive vitamin D levels.…”
Section: Measurement Of Vitamin Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Powe et al reported that black Americans have lower serum VDBP concentrations as measured by a monoclonal antibody assay than white Americans; therefore, despite a lower total 25-(OH)D level in black Americans, the calculated bioavailable concentration of 25-(OH)D is similar for black and white Americans [5]. These data suggest that the commonly reported low vitamin D levels for black Americans may reflect the measurement of total rather than bioavailable 25-(OH)D concentrations[6]; however, this interpretation remains controversial since results differ with another VDBP assay[710]. In addition, two recent studies reported increases in both PTH and VDBP with initiation of tenofovir (TDF)-containing ART [11, 12], suggestive of an induced “functional” vitamin D defiency, but neither study calculated bioavailable 25-(OH)D or compared differences by race.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%