1975
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740875002683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two independent structure determinations of diphenyl disulphide

Abstract: The results of two independent structure determinations of diphenyl disulphide are compared by means of half-normal probability plots. No systematic errors are detected except in the temperature factors of the sulphur atoms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6) According to the literature there are several MO calculations in which a preference of the gauche (cis) form over the anti (trans) form in relation to the disulfide linkage and an energy minimum in the dihedral angle near 90°have been shown. 7,8) Furthermore, some structural data for comparatively simple disulfides such as dimethyl disulfide, 9,10) dibenzyl disulfide, 11) and diphenyl disulfide 12,13) by other investigators were in agreement with this prediction. However, there have not been many studies on the conformations of disulfide compounds and a more detailed investigation of their conformations is still valuable.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6) According to the literature there are several MO calculations in which a preference of the gauche (cis) form over the anti (trans) form in relation to the disulfide linkage and an energy minimum in the dihedral angle near 90°have been shown. 7,8) Furthermore, some structural data for comparatively simple disulfides such as dimethyl disulfide, 9,10) dibenzyl disulfide, 11) and diphenyl disulfide 12,13) by other investigators were in agreement with this prediction. However, there have not been many studies on the conformations of disulfide compounds and a more detailed investigation of their conformations is still valuable.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…3-85.8°a nd these values are slightly lower than those (83.9-96.6°) in the MO calculations and structural data described above. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Syntheses of 1-(Benzoylthio)indolizine Derivatives According to the procedure described earlier by us 14) these 1-benzoylthio-2-(R-thio)indolizine derivatives 4a-x were synthesized from the S-alkylation of pyridinium 1-[2-(R-thio)-2-thioxo]ethanides (1a-x) with phenacyl bromide (2), followed by the treatment of the resulting pyridinium salts (3a-x) with 1,8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) and chloranil in chloroform at 0°C. These results are summarized in Chart 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C(1)-S(2) and C(3)-S(3) distances are slightly shorter than S-C(sp 2) single bonds, e.g. 1.747 A in $3(SO2Ph)2 (Chen & Wang, 1984) and 1-789, 1.788A in (PhS)2 (Sacerdoti & Gilli, 1975). Unlike those of (1), the two endocyclic S-C bond lengths are identical within their standard deviations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…An extraordinarily long C-C bond of 1.64 A was predicted for hexaphenylethane (Hounshell, Dougherty, Hummel & Mislow, 1977). Comparable C-S bond lengths and C-S-C bond angles are: 1.847(2) A, 76.8(3) ° in trimethylene sulfide (Karakido & Kuchitsu, 1975) (Sacerdoti, Gilli & Domiano, 1975), 1.785 (2) A in di-2-pyridyl disulfide (Raghavan & Serf, 1977), 1.776(6) A, 103 ° in di-o-tosyl sulfide (Sarcerdoti, Bertolasi & Gilli, 1976).…”
Section: -C(mi)-c(1a)-c(2a)mentioning
confidence: 99%