2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two indirect ELISA coating antigens for the detection of dairy cow antibodies against Pasteurella multocida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P. multocida strain M-1404 serotype B:2 was grown in the brain heart infusion broth (BHI broth; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) at 37°C for 6 h and was then cultured on brain heart infusion agar (BHA; Difco) at 37°C for 18 h. One single colony was selected for the preparation of bacterial suspension for challenge exposure [10]. Heat extract antigen was prepared according to the method described previously for ELISA detection [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. multocida strain M-1404 serotype B:2 was grown in the brain heart infusion broth (BHI broth; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) at 37°C for 6 h and was then cultured on brain heart infusion agar (BHA; Difco) at 37°C for 18 h. One single colony was selected for the preparation of bacterial suspension for challenge exposure [10]. Heat extract antigen was prepared according to the method described previously for ELISA detection [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the diagnostic potential and to complement the immunoblotting results, standardized indirect-ELISA was developed as described previously [41,55]. Moreover, serum samples (n = 33) from infected goats were used to calculate diagnostic sensitivity and serum samples of all goats before artificial infection (n = 35) were used to calculate diagnostic specificity of rHc-CS based indirect ELISA using following formula [56].…”
Section: Optimization and Development Of Indirect-elisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the diagnostic potential and to complement the immunoblotting results, standardized indirect-ELISA was developed as described previously [41,55]. Moreover, serum samples (n=33) from infected goats were used to calculate diagnostic sensitivity and serum samples of all goats before artificial infection (n=35) were used to calculate diagnostic specificity of rHc-CS based indirect ELISA using following formula [56].…”
Section: Immunoblotting Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%