2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two kriging interpolation methods applied to spatiotemporal rainfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to explore the temporal variation of ten large river basins, Kriging interpolation was chosen to generate grid data due to its good performance with geographic data [41]. The spherical semi-variogram model was used as the weighting function in interpolation [11].…”
Section: Spatial Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to explore the temporal variation of ten large river basins, Kriging interpolation was chosen to generate grid data due to its good performance with geographic data [41]. The spherical semi-variogram model was used as the weighting function in interpolation [11].…”
Section: Spatial Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial density of rain gauge networks is rarely sufficient to capture the spatial and temporal variability of the precipitation at small scales (McMillan et al, 2012;Volkmann, Lyon, Gupta, & Troch, 2010). The use of interpolation techniques that combine point and distributed rainfall measurements (i.e., radar or satellite data) partially overcomes this drawback (Bargaoui & Chebbi, 2009;Haberlandt, 2007), but radar and satellite data are not always available at the appropriate temporal and spatial resolutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few authors have compared the efficiency of different interpolation techniques with kriging, cokriging, and kriging with external drift (Hoeksema et al, 1989;Boezio et al, 2006;Pardo-Igúzquiza and Chica-Olmo, 2007;Ahmadi and Sedghamiz, 2008;Bargaoui and Chebbi, 2008). Kriging using DEM information as an external drift seems to be the most efficient methodology for unconfined aquifer units (Desbarats et al, 2002;Rivest et al, 2008), which is in agreement with the high correlation between hydraulic head and soil surface in such systems (Tóth, 1962).…”
Section: Experimental Site and Datamentioning
confidence: 68%