2002
DOI: 10.1007/s11743-002-0228-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two methods to estimate the standard free energy of adsorption

Abstract: To determine the increment of the standard free energy per methylene group ∆G 0 CH 2 for ionic and nonionic surfactants, two calculation methods are proposed. One procedure is based on the adsorption energy parameter of the respective adsorption isotherm, and the second on the critical micelle concentration. Experimental surface tension isotherms for two homologous series, a nonionic (C n BHB) and an ionic (C n TAB) surfactant, are used to demonstrate how the methods work. As adsorption isotherms, the Frumkin … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in good agreement with Eq. [7]. These results suggest that at the beginning the adsorption is a diffusive process and the γ (t) decay is well described by Eq.…”
Section: Dynamic Surface Tension (Dst)supporting
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is in good agreement with Eq. [7]. These results suggest that at the beginning the adsorption is a diffusive process and the γ (t) decay is well described by Eq.…”
Section: Dynamic Surface Tension (Dst)supporting
confidence: 57%
“…For all solutions the solvent surface tension, γ 0 , is obtained at the intercept, t = 0 with respect to Eq. [7]. For the surfactant with shorter polyoxyethylene chain, NIHG550, the γ (t) decays to a lower value at a specific time than it does for NIHG750.…”
Section: Dynamic Surface Tension (Dst)mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations