2018
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Molecular Assays for Detection and Characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus Triazole Resistance and Cyp51A Mutations in Clinical Isolates and Primary Clinical Samples of Immunocompromised Patients

Abstract: In hematological patients, the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) caused by azole resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAf) is rising. As the diagnosis of IA is rarely based on positive culture in this group of patients, molecular detection of resistance mutations directly from clinical samples is crucial. In addition to the in-house azole resistance ARAf polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays detecting the frequent mutation combinations TR34/L98H, TR46/Y121F/T289A, and M220 in the Aspergillus fumigatus (A.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 This observation is indirectly confirmed by cohorts reporting higher performance of PCR, both in BAL and serum, in those receiving mould active agents. [21][22][23] Also in our study, the rate of qPCR positivity in GM positive BAL samples was higher form patients receiving mould active drugs compared to those not treated. Better specification which portion of BAL fluid should be used might be warranted, since by testing supernatant, DNA still within the organism or phagocytic host cells might not be detected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…16 This observation is indirectly confirmed by cohorts reporting higher performance of PCR, both in BAL and serum, in those receiving mould active agents. [21][22][23] Also in our study, the rate of qPCR positivity in GM positive BAL samples was higher form patients receiving mould active drugs compared to those not treated. Better specification which portion of BAL fluid should be used might be warranted, since by testing supernatant, DNA still within the organism or phagocytic host cells might not be detected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Amplification of resistance targets was not successful in 7 of 52 PCR reactions and these materials originated from three sera and a lung biopsy. The other six lung biopsies with A. fumigatus were successfully characterized, demonstrating a success rate of 86% for FFPE tissues, which is very similar to the performance of this assay in non-FFPE clinical materials (White et al, 2017 ; Buil et al, 2018 ; Postina et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…and it only took about 6 h, which included about 2 h for DNA extraction, 3 h for allele-specific real-time PCR detection, and 1 h for data analysis. Our assay had favorable sensitivity (300 fg/well, corresponding to about 100 CFU per reaction mixture volume) for all mutations tested compared to the sensitivity of currently established PCR assays detecting triazole resistance (600 fg of A. fumigatus DNA for the TR 34 mutation, 4 pg for the M220 mutation, and 300 fg for L98H mutation) (7,31). Moreover, we interpreted the sensitivity of our allele-specific real-time PCR method by using CFU counts, which are widely used in evaluating the number of viable cells of microbes (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%