2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two new HTLV-I/II screening methods, Abbott Alinity i rHTLV-I/II and Diasorin LIAISON® XL murex recHTLV-I/II, to Abbott architect rHTLVI/II assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the comparison of the assays evaluated, when we categorized them into low, intermediate and high RLU ( Figure 2a ) according to the CLIA sensitivity cut-off point, it was identified that the low and intermediate zones were negative in the WB and the FC-Simplex. The CLIA’s very low cut-off point is a good factor for using this methodology as a screening test, as has been observed in other studies carried out to verify the application of this assay during screening [3032,36]. However, false-positive results in immunological assays need to be evaluated and minimized, as this impacts the quality of life of candidates for blood donations with a positive result during screening tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the comparison of the assays evaluated, when we categorized them into low, intermediate and high RLU ( Figure 2a ) according to the CLIA sensitivity cut-off point, it was identified that the low and intermediate zones were negative in the WB and the FC-Simplex. The CLIA’s very low cut-off point is a good factor for using this methodology as a screening test, as has been observed in other studies carried out to verify the application of this assay during screening [3032,36]. However, false-positive results in immunological assays need to be evaluated and minimized, as this impacts the quality of life of candidates for blood donations with a positive result during screening tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Conducting research with other populations would provide complementary data and give a better overview of the prevalence of the HTLV virus in Amazonas. If new surveys are carried out on blood donors, it would be interesting to use the same assay methodologies as in the present study, with the aim of providing a safer comparison, taking into account that ELISA and CLIA may differ in terms of the screening and diagnosis process [30,35,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Elecsys HTLV-I/II assay showed 100% sensitivity and 99.91% specificity to the Architect rHTLV-I/II assay and 98.63% specificity and 99.95% specificity to the Ortho Avioq HTLV-I/II assay using a large-scale collection of samples from Europe and Japan ( 13 ). In addition, both the Abbott Alinity i rHTLV-I/II and DiaSorin Liaison XL murex recHTLV-I/II tests showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity to the Architect rHTLV-I/II assay ( 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%