2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5005734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two recent storm surge events based on results of field surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2019), Mattar and Borvarán (2016), Nakamura et al. (2017) and Pradhan et al. (2018), a total of 36 physical parametrization configurations were utilized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019), Mattar and Borvarán (2016), Nakamura et al. (2017) and Pradhan et al. (2018), a total of 36 physical parametrization configurations were utilized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the storm-surge-induced current could intensify flood hazard. The surge-generated current combined with wave runup could cause severe onshore washout or scour damage (Borga et al, 2017;Fritz et al, 2007;Nakamura et al, 2017), beach erosion, or even breach (Seabergh, 2010) during storm events; the heavy debris carried by surge flow could also cause further damage to buildings and infrastructures. Large inundation velocity could cause hazards to pedestrians and building damage (Becker et al, 2015;Olbert et al, 2017;Pistrika & Jonkman, 2010;Takagi et al, 2016).…”
Section: 1029/2019jc015249mentioning
confidence: 99%