2011
DOI: 10.1002/pri.527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Resistance Training Protocols, 6RM versus 12RM, to Increase the 1RM in Healthy Young Adults. A Single‐Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Both 6RM and 12RM training protocols improve maximum strength in recreationally active healthy young adults, with no significant difference between the protocols.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, there are numerous reports on strength-trained participants gaining more from a larger training load compared with untrained subjects [30]. Thus, it is essential to know the training experience of the participants when comparing the strength-enhancing effects of low-and high-loads RT [3,9,14,23,35]. In addition to analyzing the effects of loading magnitude on maximal strength (1RM est ), we assessed the velocity changes produced for each training protocol on the first (F MPV ) and the last (L MPV ) absolute load common to pre-and post-tests in an attempt to determine the extent to which the distinct training interventions (low loads vs. moderate loads) affected the different parts of the load-velocity relationship.…”
Section: Strength Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, there are numerous reports on strength-trained participants gaining more from a larger training load compared with untrained subjects [30]. Thus, it is essential to know the training experience of the participants when comparing the strength-enhancing effects of low-and high-loads RT [3,9,14,23,35]. In addition to analyzing the effects of loading magnitude on maximal strength (1RM est ), we assessed the velocity changes produced for each training protocol on the first (F MPV ) and the last (L MPV ) absolute load common to pre-and post-tests in an attempt to determine the extent to which the distinct training interventions (low loads vs. moderate loads) affected the different parts of the load-velocity relationship.…”
Section: Strength Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 12-repetition maximum (12RM) weight was identified per individual and defined as the load on the leg press so that the current findings could be compared with previous EMG recordings and training settings [ 3 , 16 ]. It is used in most of the comparable studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular recorder had a sampling frequency of 4000Hz and an amplifier bandwidth frequency of 5-1000Hz. The EMG signal above 400Hz (high pass filter) and below 10Hz (low pass filter) was filtered off and the frequencies in between were smoothed by the software (“proEMG”) of the recorder to the root mean square (RMS) as the unit being used in most EMG studies [ 3 , 16 ]. As its name says, the RMS is the square root of the mean of the squared single signals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-rM = W / (1.0278-0.0278 × r) [27] After one hour, 10-rM was determined by making the participants lift 75% of the determined 1-rM to volitional exhaustion [34]. When the subjects lifted the weight more than 10 times, the resistance was increased.…”
Section: Quadriceps Strengthening Exercise Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%