2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/ecc.2019.8796191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Robust Static Output Feedback $H_{2}$ Design Approaches for Car Lateral Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improving the damping effect of the system is the sole purpose of using this lookahead approach. 4 Various control methods, such as adaptive-PID control, 5 Robust fuzzy-PID control, 6 Robust H N control, 7 H 2 control, 8 Integrated Backstepping and sliding mode control, 9 adaptive sliding mode control, 10 and adaptive neural network-based control, 11 for controlling the vehicles have been employed. Although these control methods have the capacity to improve the lateral performance, it is not guaranteed to handle the output constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving the damping effect of the system is the sole purpose of using this lookahead approach. 4 Various control methods, such as adaptive-PID control, 5 Robust fuzzy-PID control, 6 Robust H N control, 7 H 2 control, 8 Integrated Backstepping and sliding mode control, 9 adaptive sliding mode control, 10 and adaptive neural network-based control, 11 for controlling the vehicles have been employed. Although these control methods have the capacity to improve the lateral performance, it is not guaranteed to handle the output constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On-road vehicle research regards high speeds and traditionally adopted dynamic models based on the well-known bicycle model [4], [5], [6], [7] while off-road research, notably due to high slips, prefers to adopt a robotic perspective by widely considering kinematic or extended kinematic models [8], [9]. Off-road works are nonetheless beginning to consider dynamic models [10], demonstrating a convergence between the two fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, much literature relies on parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions as e.g. Becker (1995), Wu et al (1996), Apkarian and Adams (1997), Wu and Dong (2005), de Souza and Trofino (2006), Sato (2011), Mustaki et al (2019). On the other hand, there exist scaling approaches such as Packard (1994), Apkarian and Gahinet (1995) for Dscalings, Helmersson (1998) for positive real-scalings, Scorletti and Ghaoui (1998) for D/G-scalings, and Scherer (2000), Veenman and Scherer (2014) for full block scalings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concrete applications of LPV design with H 2 -performance criteria are e.g. the control of autonomous cars and helicopters in Mustaki et al (2019) and Guerreiro et al (2007), respectively. Note that all former scaling approaches cannot cope with H 2 -criteria for LPV design since they eliminate the controller parameters, which is not even feasible for nominal H 2 -design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%