“…Strains with promoter types with mutations only in the attenuator region or that did not contain mutations creating a consensus −35 box only expressed ampC 1–4‐fold, similar to strains with promoter types with mutations outside of functional elements (Table 1). This study supports previous studies that showed that it is the creation of a consensus −35 box, whether by a T→A transversion at position −32 or a C→T transition at position −42, that is the most dominant factor in strengthening the ampC promoter (Jaurin et al , 1982; Olsson et al , 1982, 1983; Caroff et al , 1999, 2000; Nelson & Elisha, 1999; Forward et al , 2001; Corvec et al , 2003). The results also support previous studies showing that optimal spacing between −35 and −10 boxes is also an important factor contributing to promoter strength (Jaurin et al , 1981; Siu et al , 2003).…”