2012
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two simulation methods to compute solvation free energies and partition coefficients

Abstract: The thermodynamic integration (TI) and expanded ensemble (EE) methods are used here to calculate the hydration free energy in water, the solvation free energy in 1-octanol, and the octanol-water partition coefficient for a six compounds of varying functionality using the optimized potentials for liquid simulations (OPLS) all-atom (AA) force field parameters and atomic charges. Both methods use the molecular dynamics algorithm as a primary component of the simulation protocol, and both have found wide applicati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(179 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This force field has been validated with both experimental data and ab initio calculations [68][70]. Additionally, previous studies [25], [28], [79] have used OPLS to calculate solvation energies and phase behavior for systems involving water/chloroform and octanol/water. The solutes in these studies consisted of n-alkane, polar, nonpolar, alcohol, aromatic, and polychlorinated biphenyl molecules.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This force field has been validated with both experimental data and ab initio calculations [68][70]. Additionally, previous studies [25], [28], [79] have used OPLS to calculate solvation energies and phase behavior for systems involving water/chloroform and octanol/water. The solutes in these studies consisted of n-alkane, polar, nonpolar, alcohol, aromatic, and polychlorinated biphenyl molecules.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As shown in Fig. 7, 94% of the computational tasks could be finished within 40 min for each compound, while a typical explicit-solvent simulation method requires hundreds of CPU hours even for a relative small molecule [127]. By contrast, the average computation time is 27 min based on the MDFT calculation on a desktop PC with single Intel E-1230CPU core.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Particularly, molecular simulations begin with a description of the energy and forces in a physical system as a function of the coordinates -what is known as a "force field" -and allow calculation of numerous physical properties from simulations of such systems 28 . In addition to potentially providing predictions of various quantities like host-guest and protein-ligand binding affinities, [29][30][31][32][33] distribution and partition coefficients, 34,35 solvation free energies [36][37][38] or other physical properties for design applications, comparison of such results to experiment provides a quantitative test of the underlying physical model or force field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%