2005
DOI: 10.1177/104063870501700112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Swine Mycoplasma Hyopneumoniae Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Detection of Antibodies from Vaccinated Pigs and Field Serum Samples

Abstract: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhyo) causes mycoplasmal pneumonia, an economically important disease of swine. Serodiagnosis of Mhyo is based on the current available commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of swine antibodies against Mhyo, which are the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the blocking ELISA (B-ELISA). Because of the limited information available for these ELISAs, these 2 assays were compared by testing 347 serum samples collected from vaccinated pigs at 0, 13, 28, 43, and 6… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All blood by sampling day were centrifuged at 600 g for 15 min at 4 °C and the serum was analyzed for MHYO and PCV2 antibodies using respectively a monoclonal blocking ELISA Oxoid™ Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Oxoid LTD, UK) and an indirect ELISA Ingezim Circo IgG 1.1 PCV.K1 (Ingenasa, Spain), following manufacturers’ instructions. The Oxoid™ ELISA detects antibodies against the 74kD outer external protein of MHYO and is considered more sensitive than and at least as specific as other tests [35]. The Oxoid™ ELISA is less useful to measure antibody levels (it measures percentage of inhibition), but in our study working with conventional pigs that may have unspecific serum reactions for other Mycoplasma species [36], the Oxoid™ ELISA kit was selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All blood by sampling day were centrifuged at 600 g for 15 min at 4 °C and the serum was analyzed for MHYO and PCV2 antibodies using respectively a monoclonal blocking ELISA Oxoid™ Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Oxoid LTD, UK) and an indirect ELISA Ingezim Circo IgG 1.1 PCV.K1 (Ingenasa, Spain), following manufacturers’ instructions. The Oxoid™ ELISA detects antibodies against the 74kD outer external protein of MHYO and is considered more sensitive than and at least as specific as other tests [35]. The Oxoid™ ELISA is less useful to measure antibody levels (it measures percentage of inhibition), but in our study working with conventional pigs that may have unspecific serum reactions for other Mycoplasma species [36], the Oxoid™ ELISA kit was selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A blocking ELISA (IDEI, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae EIA kit, Oxoid) and two indirect ELISA tests (HerdCheck, IDEXX and Tween 20-ELISA) are the most frequently used serological tests to detect antibodies to M. hyopneumoniae. Comparative studies have reported differing specificities and sensitivities between these kits (Pijoan, 1994;Strait et al, 2004;Ameri-Mahabadi et al, 2005;Erlandson, 2005). When discrepancies in serological test results are identified, a Western blot immunoassay (WBI) targeting different M. hyopneumoniae antigens can be used as a confirmatory test (Ameri et al, 2006).…”
Section: Serological Detection Of M Hyopneumoniae Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kappa coefficients for agreement obtained in the current study were higher than those described in previous studies 5 ; however, the kappa coefficients were similar to those described in previous studies comparing the blocking ELISA with another indirect ELISA. 1 This information is important with regards to interpretation of results in field cases. Knowledge of the optimal time for testing, according to the test being used, helps the practitioner to determine the best test according to the stage of infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In another independent study, the Dako ELISA assay was also compared to another M. hyopneumoniae indirect ELISA b showing that the Dako ELISA was more successful in identifying positive samples. 1 It has been shown that sensitivity of these serological tests is influenced by the infection stage of the host, suggesting that these assays are less sensitive early in infection. 5 However, information on the performance of these serological tests in repeatedly measured challenged pigs has not been extensively reported in the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%