2000 International Conference on Ion Implantation Technology Proceedings. Ion Implantation Technology - 2000 (Cat. No.00EX432)
DOI: 10.1109/.2000.924194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ultra-shallow junctions with PLAD and beamline implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it should be mentioned that plasma doping (PLAD) with a BF 3 plasma and pulse voltages between 200 and 5000 V results in better device characteristics for ultra-shallow junctions than conventional beamline implantation [50], which indicates a significant role of surface adsorption or electron bombardment in that application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it should be mentioned that plasma doping (PLAD) with a BF 3 plasma and pulse voltages between 200 and 5000 V results in better device characteristics for ultra-shallow junctions than conventional beamline implantation [50], which indicates a significant role of surface adsorption or electron bombardment in that application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the as-implanted and the spike-annealed wafer results show shallower profiles for PLAD than for the expected equivalent BF2'. Evidence of boron clustering has been found in regions of high B concentration during the anneals and it is thought that the spike anneals are too short to dissolve them completely, resulting in shallower annealed implants for PLAD compared to both BF; and B' beamline results at equivalent energies [7].…”
Section: Ultra-shallow Junction Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%