2015
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ultrashort echo time sequences for MRI of an ancient mummified human hand

Abstract: This work provided an initial analysis for the optimization of imaging protocols for paleoradiology studies with MRI, and, ultimately, for MRI of tissue with extremely short T2 *.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(53 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hand sample did not load the coil, as reported in Ref. 18 and the foot sample loaded it very slightly, indicating coil-dominated noise. The bandwidth obtained at −3 dB from an S 21 measurement was 0.67 MHz, corresponding to a Q of 190.…”
Section: Radiofrequency Systemmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The hand sample did not load the coil, as reported in Ref. 18 and the foot sample loaded it very slightly, indicating coil-dominated noise. The bandwidth obtained at −3 dB from an S 21 measurement was 0.67 MHz, corresponding to a Q of 190.…”
Section: Radiofrequency Systemmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Each data set has been assigned a scan number that will be used to reference the respective scan in the remainder of this paper. The target T 2 used to determine the effect of the HYFI parameter A was 200 µs for all scans, which was based on previous findings 18 . In addition to the imaging data, FID signals without spatial selection were recorded for all sample/coil configurations to enable decay component analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Six plastic tubes filled with contrast agent RESOVIST (Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Leverkusen, Germany) corresponding to Fe concentrations of 0.02, 0.029, 0.038, 0.056, 0.071, and 0.1 M were imaged. For the UTE acquisition, the following parameters were used: TE = 70 µs; TR = 2.6 ms; flip angle = 2°; averages = 10; FOV = 320 mm; BW = 1488 Hz/px; radial spokes = 64000, number of points per spoke = 160; total scan time = 1664 s. With CEA, the following parameters were used: RF bandwidth = 128 kHz; TR = 2.6 ms; effective flip angle = 0.12°; averages = 10; FOV = 320 mm; acquisition time = 2.1 ms; radial spokes = 64000, number of points per spoke = 320; total scan time = 1664 s. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values were calculated and scaled to account for the differences in imaging parameters 42 . A UTE pulse sequence with the same parameters was also used to measure T 2 * of the phantoms for TE = {70, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 500} µs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%