“…Evaluated citrus peel by-products could be transformed into value-added products Gómez-Mejía et al ( 2019 ) | Mango peel | Maceration and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) | Maceration: 5 g peel powder, 40 °C, 5000 rpm, 10 min Ultrasound-assisted extraction: Frequency: 35 kHz@Temperature: 35, 45, 55 °C@Solvent analyzed: Methanol and ethanol | Maceration: 18.66 UAE: 67.58 | UAE proved as a better extraction technique. Mango peel has an adequate amount of phenolics, making it a suitable ingredient for preparation of functional foods | Safdar et al ( 2017 ) |
Grape seeds | Maceration, ultrasound-assisted extraction and Soxhlet extraction | Soxhlet extraction Seed sample: 25 g, 50 °C, 300 ml n-hexane solvent usage for 6 h UAE with maceration: Seed sample: 25 g, 20 kHz, 150 W, 30 min at 30 °C-50 °C. Maceration time: 12 h | 105.20 | Better oil recovery observed when grape seeds were subjected to UAE as compared to traditional Soxhlet | Da Porto et al ( 2013 ) |
Apple | Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) vs ultrasound-assisted extraction with hydrostatic treatment | 25 kHz, 70% amplitude, 20 °C, 60 min | 748 | High extraction efficiency and inactivation of enzymes observed during ultrasound extraction combined with hydrostatic treatment | Abid et al ( 2014 ) |
Cantaloupe melon | Ultrasound-assisted extraction | 376 W/cm 2 , 10 min | – | Juice homogeneity improvements during treatment | Fonteles et al ( 2012 ) |
Rosemary and thyme extracts | Conventional vs ultrasound-assisted extraction | Conventional: 1200 rpm Ultrasound-assisted extraction: 28.7 W/cm 2 400 W, 40 °C | Thyme: 158 Rosemary: 15.4 | Ultrasound stimulated activity of Bifidobacterium. |
…”