1982
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330580309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold measurements in assessment of subcutaneous and total fatness

Abstract: Ultrasound (A-scan mode) and skinfold methods were evaluated in the measurement of subcutaneous fat thickness and prediction of total fat weight (by whole body potassium counting). Based on intraobserver correlations on 39 men at 15 body sites, skinfold caliper measurements were more reproducible than ones obtained by ultrasound. Measurements made with the two techniques at the same site typically produced different mean estimates of fat thickness. However, scores were often highly correlated with each other, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Studies suggest that as body fat increases, more fat is deposited in the upper arm in women than in men and this fat is deposited preferentially over deltoid muscle. 11,12 Another study found that there was a strong correlation between deltoid fat pad thickness and BMI. In that study the correlation coefficients between BMI and deltoid fat pat thickness were found to be 0.69 and 0.71 for the dominant arm and non-dominant arm respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Studies suggest that as body fat increases, more fat is deposited in the upper arm in women than in men and this fat is deposited preferentially over deltoid muscle. 11,12 Another study found that there was a strong correlation between deltoid fat pad thickness and BMI. In that study the correlation coefficients between BMI and deltoid fat pat thickness were found to be 0.69 and 0.71 for the dominant arm and non-dominant arm respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,8,9 Skinfold thickness measurements are another traditional techniques that can be applied easily and are stated to provide a reliable estimate of obesity and regional fat distribution. [10][11][12][13] However, there are limitations associated with the caliper method, which may result in inaccurate estimates of subcutaneous fat thickness and, consequently, of total body fat. These limitations include the inability to control inter-and intra-subject variation in skinfold compressibility, the inability to palpate the fat-muscle interface and the impossibility of obtaining interpretable measurements on very obese subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this population, Kabir and Forsum [29] also found that TS underestimates the adipose tissue in comparison with ultrasound measurements. Like anthropometry, the ultrasonic method has shortcomings when measuring subcutaneous tissue [30] and cross-sectional muscle areas, at least in adults [31] . In this study, the MRI was chosen as the gold standard method for measuring the arm compartments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%