2013
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ultrasound guidance with the traditional palpation and fluoroscopy method for the common femoral artery puncture

Abstract: Ultrasound guidance improves secondary outcomes of the common femoral artery puncture when compared to palpation-guided puncture. Technical success and complication rates seem lower in the presence of ultrasound guidance but larger study populations are needed to verify the result.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a more recent trial, interventional radiologists from two institutions randomized 208 patients undergoing retrograde puncture of the common femoral artery to either ultrasound-guided or palpation-guided puncture 33 . As with the FAUST trial, higher first pass success rates, fewer total number of attempts required for access, and reduced times to sheath insertion were seen in the group in whom ultrasound-guided puncture was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more recent trial, interventional radiologists from two institutions randomized 208 patients undergoing retrograde puncture of the common femoral artery to either ultrasound-guided or palpation-guided puncture 33 . As with the FAUST trial, higher first pass success rates, fewer total number of attempts required for access, and reduced times to sheath insertion were seen in the group in whom ultrasound-guided puncture was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multicentre RCT found RTUS-guidance for retrograde femoral artery access to be more successful than fluoroscopic guidance, but only in patients with a high bifurcation of the common femoral artery. In all patients RTUS-guidance improved first-pass access rate and speed of the procedure and resulted in a lower rate of venous puncture [44,55,56]. If traditional common femoral artery access is hampered by morbid obesity or by a "hostile groin", RTUS-guided superficial artery access seems to be technically easier, safer and faster compared with RTUS-guided common femoral artery access [55].…”
Section: Technique and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Visipaque 320 [2]. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an infrequent adverse reaction to iodinated contrast agents [3]. In endovascular procedures, particular complex procedures are associated with CIN and larger doses of contrast are considered a risk factor.…”
Section: Angiography and Endovascular Therapy For Peripheral Artery Dmentioning
confidence: 99%