2019
DOI: 10.1111/asj.13242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of urine and blood as a convenient and practical sample for estimating the contamination level of live cattle with radioactive cesium

Abstract: Blood and urine were compared to clarify which is a better sample for estimating the concentration of radioactive cesium in muscles of live cattle. The most probable concentration of 137 Cs in muscles was 21.0 times that in blood, and the error of this estimation was 28%. The concentration of 137 Cs in blood was estimated accurately using urine samples. The estimation error did not increase so much (33%), even when the concentration of 137 Cs in muscles was estimated using urine samples. On the other hand, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, there were reports that cattle excrete RCs more in feces than in urine. 8,16) In this study, the recovery of SCs in feces was comparable to these observations in cattle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, there were reports that cattle excrete RCs more in feces than in urine. 8,16) In this study, the recovery of SCs in feces was comparable to these observations in cattle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…5) Four reports have estimated radioactive caesium (RCs) concentration in muscle from its blood or urine RCs level in cattle. 4,[6][7][8] However, there are no reports on the characteristics of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters related to absorption, distribution, and elimination of RCs in cattle. If PK parameters of cattle is evaluated, it is possible to explain how to reduce RCs in meat before slaughter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%