Heat Transfer: Volume 1 2008
DOI: 10.1115/ht2008-56054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Vacuum Glazing Thermal Performance Predicted Using Two and Three Dimensional Models and Their Experimental Validation

Abstract: The thermal performance of vacuum glazing was predicted using two dimensional (2-D) finite element and three dimensional (3-D) finite volume models. In the 2-D model, the vacuum space, including the pillar arrays, was represented by a material whose effective thermal conductivity was determined from the specified vacuum space width, the heat conduction through the pillar array and the calculated radiation heat transfer between the two interior glass surfaces within the vacuum gap. In the 3-D model, the support… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar hypotheses can also be found in references [26,29,30]. The gaseous conductive and convective heat transfer is negligible in a vacuum environment of 0.1 Pa or less.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar hypotheses can also be found in references [26,29,30]. The gaseous conductive and convective heat transfer is negligible in a vacuum environment of 0.1 Pa or less.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…2 for vacuum glazing. This approach is deemed adequate to predict the thermal responses of vacuum glazing given its symmetric structure, and has been adopted in many existing studies to reduce the computation time [29].…”
Section: Heat Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total glazing area contains the edge effects, whilst the centre-of-pane does not [30]. The ASTM [31] testing conditions are followed, in which the internal and external surface heat-transfer coefficients h were set to 8.3 Wm −2 K −1 and 30 Wm −2 K −1 , respectively [32], and the internal and external surface air temperatures were set to be at 21.1 • C and −17.8 • C, respectively. The glass surface-to-surface thermal transmittance of the total glazing (U t ) and the centre-of-pane glazing (U c ) is defined by Equations (18) and (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall heat transmission of the simulated 0.5 m × 0.5 m TVG has found to be 32.6 % greater than that of the 1 m × 1 m TVG, since heat conduction through the edge seal of the small glazing has a larger contribution to the total glazing heat transfer than that of the larger glazing system. Fang et al [30] have analysed thermal performance of vacuum glazing by using 2D finite element and 3D finite volume models. In the 2D model, the vacuum space, including the pillar arrays, has been represented by a material whose effective thermal conductivity is determined from the specified vacuum space width, the heat conduction through the Welded edges pillar array and the calculated radiation heat transfer between the two interior glass surfaces within the vacuum gap.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%