2014
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201400914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various capillary electrophoretic approaches for the study of drug–protein interaction with emphasis on minimal consumption of protein sample and possibility of automation†

Abstract: The binding ability of a drug to plasma proteins influences the pharmacokinetics of a drug. As a result, it is a very important issue in new drug development. In this study, affinity capillary electrophoresis, capillary electrophoresis with frontal analysis, and Hummel Dreyer methods with internal and external calibration were used to study the affinity between bovine serum albumin and salicylic acid. The binding constant was measured by all these approaches including the equilibrium dialysis, which is conside… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many methods have been developed for studying drug–protein interactions including CE with its several important benefits in this field, such as no need for (i) highly purified samples, (ii) immobilization, and (iii) labelling of any of the interacting species . Recently we performed a comprehensive evaluation of the three most used CE approaches for the study of drug–protein interaction, ACE, capillary electrophoresis‐frontal analysis (FA) and Hummel Dreyer methods with internal and external calibrations using HSA–salicylic acid as a model affinity pair . The comparison indicated CE–FA to be the best approach, characterized by a high sample throughput with the possibility of automation, very small quantities of biomacromolecules, simplicity and a short analysis time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been developed for studying drug–protein interactions including CE with its several important benefits in this field, such as no need for (i) highly purified samples, (ii) immobilization, and (iii) labelling of any of the interacting species . Recently we performed a comprehensive evaluation of the three most used CE approaches for the study of drug–protein interaction, ACE, capillary electrophoresis‐frontal analysis (FA) and Hummel Dreyer methods with internal and external calibrations using HSA–salicylic acid as a model affinity pair . The comparison indicated CE–FA to be the best approach, characterized by a high sample throughput with the possibility of automation, very small quantities of biomacromolecules, simplicity and a short analysis time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are characterized by several important benefits such as no need for highly purified samples, immobilization, and labelling of any of the interacting partners. Recently Michalcová et al performed a systematic evaluation of the three most used CE approaches for the study of plasma protein-drug interaction -affinity capillary electrophoresis, CE-FA and the Hummel-Dreyer method -using BSA-salicylic acid as the model system [21]. Their comparison, focused mainly on a capacity for high sample throughput with the possibility of automation and minimal consumption of samples, showed CE-FA to be the best approach.…”
Section: Capillary Electrophoresis-frontal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ACE, a high selectivity of (bio)affinity recognition is combined with high separation efficiency of CE in a free solution. Thus, ACE possesses a great potential for investigation of the (bio)molecular noncovalent interactions under mild conditions and for estimation of binding (stability, association, formation) or dissociation constants of the formed complexes as demonstrated in several recent reviews . ACE involves several modes based either on the separation of the interacting species and determination of their equilibrium concentration, such as in the Hummel–Dreyer method , the vacancy peak method , frontal analysis , continuous frontal analysis , and kinetic CE , or on the detection of a specific physicochemical property of the complexed ligand or the binding partner, mostly the mobility shift assay .…”
Section: Separations In Different Ce and Cec Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these methods utilize the differences in the migration velocities of the interacting species. Both theoretical and experimental considerations for these methods and their applications for estimation of binding constants have been outlined in the above reviews [] ; the particular recent applications to peptide interaction studies are presented in the Section .…”
Section: Separations In Different Ce and Cec Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%