2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-7946(03)80210-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various flow visualisation techniques in a gas-liquid mixed tank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[34], [35]). ERT was also applied to the mixing and storage vessels varying from 15-40 cm in diameter ( [36], [37]) to find out mixing characteristics. Some of the notable research works on the study of two phase flow behavior in bubble columns with help of ERT were summarized Table.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34], [35]). ERT was also applied to the mixing and storage vessels varying from 15-40 cm in diameter ( [36], [37]) to find out mixing characteristics. Some of the notable research works on the study of two phase flow behavior in bubble columns with help of ERT were summarized Table.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miettien et al 13 have presented a short review of the experimental flow visualization techniques for the characterization of gas-liquid flow in a mixed tank. In what concerns bubble size distribution measurements, only phase doppler anemometry (PDA) and particle image velocimetry (PIV) are indeed noninvasive techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the sensor immersed in the liquid in the tank and using the most common strategy in conventional ERT (due to minimal hardware requirements and fast image reconstruction), alternating current (AC) was injected from the DAS to the electrodes (15 mA current was used as the injection current in this study) using a pair of neighboring electrodes, and the resulting voltage was measured through all other neighboring electrodes. The AC drive current then went to the next electrode pair and the process of injecting current to neighboring electrodes was repeated until all independent pairs were covered 58–60 . When the sensor rod was inserted vertically inside the tank, the image reconstruction algorithms embedded in the software generated 2D images of the conductivity distribution inside the tank on a vertical plane through the rod, extending about 1/3 of the length of the rod in the direction perpendicular to the electrodes, that is, radially toward the impeller shaft.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%