2016
DOI: 10.17703/ijact.2016.4.2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various image fusion methods for impervious surface classification from VNREDSat-1

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first goal is to supply domestic demand with domestic technology capability instead of relying on foreign countries. It should utilize the characteristics of space technology as convergence technology, such as utilizing existing IT technology in Korea [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first goal is to supply domestic demand with domestic technology capability instead of relying on foreign countries. It should utilize the characteristics of space technology as convergence technology, such as utilizing existing IT technology in Korea [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from its advantages in substrate classifying, V1 had a limitation in that, unlike L8 and S2, it has no coastal band-and so could not acquire information on deep water in coastal areas. In addition, this is a small satellite type, with a comparatively small image size (17.5 × 17.5 km) [34,35]. While Landsat only used two scenes and S2 needed three images, to cover the study area, V1 required nine images, each covering a small area and making it difficult to collate all the imagery needed to cover the Khanh Hoa coast.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Interpretation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After assessing the overall accuracy and Kappa coefficients, all three images had relatively high quality outputs, making it possible to establish SAV distribution status in the study area. Although V1 data gave the best results for substrate classification, as it was only launched in 2013, earlier data was not available [34,35]. Therefore, selecting Landsat gave us the advantages of not only high levels of accuracy, but also a longer data record than was available from either S2 or V1.…”
Section: Temporal Changes In Sav Extentmentioning
confidence: 99%