Comparison of Various Marker Localization Methods

Vestenický, Peter; Mravec, Tomas; Vestenický, Martin

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44354-6_6

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The currents i 1 (t) and i 2 (t) in Figure 1 can be calculated by the loop current method from the system of equation (3). The resistor R is varying and its value is changed in accordance to equation (4) in every of the three time intervals.…”

Section: Mathematical Model Of the Localization Device -Marker Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 The antenna of the localization device is inductively coupled with the marker and this fact causes some negative properties of localization process, especially very rapid fall of the marker response amplitude with increasing distance between the marker and the localization device. The response amplitude is inversely proportional on the sixth power of the distance, 3 so the markers must be buried in depth no more than 1.5-2 m. This is a very limiting factor for the signal receiver in the localization device, especially due to the noise, and therefore, this article describes an analysis of the localization process and optimization of the correlation receiver adapted for receiving the responses from the markers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Optimization of receiving window width of the correlation receiver for radiofrequency identification marker localization

Vestenický

2019

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The radiofrequency identification (RFID) technology is widely used in modern industry to identify and localize the final manufactured products and their parts. This article analyses and optimizes the localization process of special RFID transponders – markers used to mark the position and type of the underground facility networks (pipes, cables, etc.). The analysis of electric circuits representing the system consisting of the marker and the localization device is performed by numerical solution of the corresponding equations. The results of the numerical solution are then used for calculation of the analytical description of the waveform received as response from the excited marker. The constants obtained from the analytical form of the solution are then used as input parameters for optimization of time window width in the correlation receiver of the marker responses. The optimization is focused on the maximization of the signal-to-noise ratio in the receiving time window. The theoretical calculations are completed by the processing of real signals recorded by an oscilloscope from the localization device where the correlation receiver is planned to apply.

show abstract

Section: Mathematical Model Of the Localization Device -Marker Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of receiving window width of the correlation receiver for radiofrequency identification marker localization

Vestenický

2019

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Subsurface utility detection using ground penetrating radar and electromagnetic locator – a comparative study

Hazreq bin Haron,

Sarah binti Tengku Amran,

Ridzuan Bin Ahmad

et al. 2024

IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The process of finding and mapping underground utilities is crucial for managing underground infrastructure effectively, especially to avoid damaging them during construction and digging. This research studies two main methods used for this purpose: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Electromagnetic Locator (EML). GPR works by using electromagnetic waves to detect and assess things underground, giving an idea of how deep they are. On the other hand, EM L help to find metal utilities by using electromagnetic fields. This shows how important it is to have accurate maps of these utilities. Having precise maps is like having a solid foundation for planning and maintaining infrastructure. It also points out that when combine information from GPR and EML and analyse the results together, it can make the findings even more accurate. In a nutshell, these methods are crucial for keeping us safe, preventing delays in projects, and making sure to use resources wisely across different industries. In this research, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is used to determine the correlation in depth accuracy error which is 0.05821 which is calculated based on the depth measured by GPR and EML.

show abstract

Comparison of Various Marker Localization Methods

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Optimization of receiving window width of the correlation receiver for radiofrequency identification marker localization

Optimization of receiving window width of the correlation receiver for radiofrequency identification marker localization

Subsurface utility detection using ground penetrating radar and electromagnetic locator – a comparative study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About