1988
DOI: 10.1109/20.92367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various methods for 3-D eddy current analysis

Abstract: = O

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Formulation Using the magnetic vector potential A and electric scalar potential V as electromagnetic field variables, the electric field intensity E in conducting region (V C ) and magnetic flux density B in conducting and non-conducting region ðV C < V N Þ are defined as (Biro and Preis, 1989;Nakata et al, 1988;Patecki et al, 1998):…”
Section: Power Losses Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Formulation Using the magnetic vector potential A and electric scalar potential V as electromagnetic field variables, the electric field intensity E in conducting region (V C ) and magnetic flux density B in conducting and non-conducting region ðV C < V N Þ are defined as (Biro and Preis, 1989;Nakata et al, 1988;Patecki et al, 1998):…”
Section: Power Losses Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system of equations ( 3)-( 5) is well known for eddy current problem (Biro and Preis, 1989;Nakata et al, 1988;Patecki et al, 1998), which defines magnetic field strength inside and around a conductor. Obviously, induced current and current divergence in conducting region are considered.…”
Section: Power Losses Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of the flow field is performed with the use of a system of equations in the form (26), (27), and energy balance Eq. (22) [8,11] (26), (27) and (22), using for example Direct Numerical Simulation method, very fine grids must be used (the number of nodes proportional to Re 9/4 ). In order to avoid it, one can introduce a turbulence model.…”
Section: Mathematical Description and Computational Model For The Anamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nakata, et al [130] have discretized the various eddy current formulations dis cussed above and compared the accuracy, computer storage and cpii time for each method. They applied the formulations to the Bath cube problem [100] and compared the magnetic flux density at certain points in the material.…”
Section: Electric Vector Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%