2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various plasticity models for metal powder compaction processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Correction factors for modeling the compaction of one powder are not necessarily applicable to another one, which decreases the effectiveness of modeling [7]. In addition, even one-parameter rheological relations derived by different authors have substantial distinctions [8]. The reasons are obvious: the plastic properties of a powder body being pressed depend not only on porosity, but also on other internal structural parameters disregarded in the simplest models [9].…”
Section: Direct Multiscale Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correction factors for modeling the compaction of one powder are not necessarily applicable to another one, which decreases the effectiveness of modeling [7]. In addition, even one-parameter rheological relations derived by different authors have substantial distinctions [8]. The reasons are obvious: the plastic properties of a powder body being pressed depend not only on porosity, but also on other internal structural parameters disregarded in the simplest models [9].…”
Section: Direct Multiscale Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the microscopic dynamic characteristics of particles cannot be studied during physical experiments, which hinder the detailed investigation of translation, rotation, interaction force, and deformation behavior of particles. Moreover, geometric nonlinearity, material nonlinearity, and contact nonlinearity of the forming process raise difficulties in the physical experiments [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the researches on the compaction of Al/SiC composite powders when subjected to external energy have increasingly attracted the materials scientists and engineers' interests in the past few years. Nevertheless, even though physical experiments can reproduce the relationship between relative density and compaction pressure and/or temperature, they are unable to quantitatively characterize the local density distribution, stress distribution, and particle motion behavior for pore (or void) filling in situ, especially the nonlinearity features in geometry, materials, and contact during compaction all increase the difficulties of physical experiments [18][19][20][21][22]. Most importantly, it's really hard for researchers to accurately control the uniform distribution (ordered or disordered) of reinforcement (SiC) in the metal (Al) matrix, these disadvantages in physical experiments can be conquered by the so called numerical simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%