2009
DOI: 10.5395/jkacd.2009.34.6.491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of viability of oral epithelial cells stored by different freezing methods

Abstract: This study examined the influence of the storage methods on the viability of oral epithelial cells using conventional cell freezing storage, slow freezing preservation, rapid freezing preservation, and slow freezing preservation with a pressure of 2 Mpa or 3 Mpa. The cell viability was evaluated by cell counting, WST-1 and the clonogenic capacity after 6 days of freezing storage. After 6 days, the frozen cells were thawed rapidly, and the cell counting, WST-1, and clonogenic capacity values were measured and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study stored rat teeth under 0 o C/2 MPa condition, which maintained the PDL cell higher in previous studies. Many studies presented that keeping the cell under pressure option maintained its viability higher than using organs such as tissues or embryos [18][19][20][21] . However, among the studies using teeth, the cell viability reduced rapidly over 3 MPa 12,19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study stored rat teeth under 0 o C/2 MPa condition, which maintained the PDL cell higher in previous studies. Many studies presented that keeping the cell under pressure option maintained its viability higher than using organs such as tissues or embryos [18][19][20][21] . However, among the studies using teeth, the cell viability reduced rapidly over 3 MPa 12,19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies presented that keeping the cell under pressure option maintained its viability higher than using organs such as tissues or embryos [18][19][20][21] . However, among the studies using teeth, the cell viability reduced rapidly over 3 MPa 12,19) . Therefore, this study selected the 0 o C/2 MPa condition which represented consistently high cell viability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%