2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-017-8336-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Vickers microhardness of undoped and Ru doped BSCCO glass ceramic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the normal indentation behaviour is well verified. Moreover, n can be used to classify the hardness of the materials; for 1  n  1.6, the material behaves hard, if it is greater than 1.6, the material is soft [29]. As seen from table 3, all the prepared samples are classified as hard materials, confirmed the ceramic behaviour of HTSC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Therefore, the normal indentation behaviour is well verified. Moreover, n can be used to classify the hardness of the materials; for 1  n  1.6, the material behaves hard, if it is greater than 1.6, the material is soft [29]. As seen from table 3, all the prepared samples are classified as hard materials, confirmed the ceramic behaviour of HTSC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Table 3 contains the MPSR parameters α 2 , α 3 and α 4 , which were derived using a standard polynomial fit to the data. The positive values of α 2 clarify that the samples suffer from both elastic and plastic deformation [36].…”
Section: Modified Proportional Sample Resistance Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The hardness value of the doped samples decreased after x = 0.4 % additive value. We think that the decrease in microhardness with increasing additive content may be due to weakening of the bond between superconducting grains and randomly distributed irregularities at grain boundaries [34]. In the surface micrographs of samples (Figure 5 a-e) showed that grain sizes, porosity and surface cracks increase as Y-content increases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%